Loading...
Home > Javascript Error > Javascript Error Security Manager Vetoed Action

Javascript Error Security Manager Vetoed Action

Join today Download & Extend Drupal Core Distributions Modules Themes Dreditor (moved)Issues Security Manager vetoed action (Firefox 3.6.13, GreaseMonkey 0.9.0) Closed (fixed)Project:Dreditor (moved)Version:6.x-1.x-devComponent:CodePriority:CriticalCategory:Bug reportAssigned:UnassignedIssue tags:firefox 3.6Reporter:wizonesolutionsCreated:January 22, 2011 - 23:45Updated:April 18, A bit further down in the same document: "On the other hand, any function that comes out of the sandbox executes with the privileges of chrome code. Bryan Next Message by Thread: Re: Security errors writing to an iframe in a signed script Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Bryan White wrote: >> netscape.security.PrivilegeManager >> .enablePrivilege("UniversalXPConnect"); > > Hmm. Barton 2009-10-27 13:59:46 PDT I guess the resolution should be wontfix, there is no patch and no test that it works now. get redirected here

The problem still persists in my firefox 14.0.1 –user525146 Aug 30 '12 at 18:42 Seems like its a bug in firefox 14, I had updated to 15 and I It is fixed in jQuery-UI 1.8.21 share|improve this answer edited Aug 30 '12 at 18:34 answered Aug 30 '12 at 17:55 Steven 925516 Is there any workaround you know At the arrow box >>> type "var a;" enter-key Actual Results: Exception as above. I don't understand it and it does not reproduce the environment of the web page even with the __scope__ additions.

Does that solve a problem I haven't thought of yet? The code that does this looks like this: var elem = document.getElementById(id); netscape.security.PrivilegeManager .enablePrivilege("UniversalXPConnect"); var doc = elem.contentDocument; doc.open(); doc.write(html); doc.close(); Ever since Firefox 2.0.0.13 this code fails. Closing... news.optonline.net [OptimumOnline] by anon257.

I'd like to have good docs on eIS, but > I'm not clear on what's not clear. > According to http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Components.utils.evalInSandbox, "The sandbox is just an empty JavaScript object marked as Mitt kontoSökMapsYouTubePlayGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÖversättFotonMerDokumentBloggerKontakterHangoutsÄnnu mer från GoogleLogga inDolda fältSök efter grupper eller meddelanden Skip to main content Skip to search Main Menu Drupal.org home Download & Extend Community Documentation Support Jobs Marketplace About There are also 2008/ and 2007/ > directories for older builds.... > > Given a one-day range, it should be possible to figure out which exact > code change caused the Comment 2 Michael Kurze [:michaelk] 2008-03-22 09:33:09 PDT Hi, maybe this helps to track down the problem: Using firebug 1.1.0b12 and Mac OS 10.5, this is WFM prior to and including:

For example, > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2008-03-28-04-mozilla1.8.0/ > > has builds from March 28, 2008. It does not block progress on firebug, but it will be a shame if we have to live with it. Board index All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] Login FAQ / Rules Register Search Boards : Knowledge Base: knowledge base chat about fr ja es mozillaZine is You can close this report as far as I am concerned.

This problem didnt occur to previous version. Comment 11 John J. Barton 2009-03-30 17:18:38 PDT Brian, Bug 484459 pushed me over the edge: I removed our code that uses evalInSandBox. What does a profile's Decay Rate actually do?

It throws an exception in the doc.open() call: [Exception... "Security Manager vetoed action" nsresult: "0x80570027 (NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO)" location: "JS frame :: jar:https://isengard.arcamax.com:2020/db/jar/gallerybuilder.jar!/lib.js :: ShowHTML :: line 584" data: no] Note that there I am using jquery-ui 1.8.18 and jquery 1.7.1 min jquery jquery-ui firefox file-upload firebug share|improve this question asked Aug 30 '12 at 17:44 user525146 1,36893369 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 If the message had been "content can't access __scope__" I would not have submitted this bug report. Try reinstalling it.Looks like v24 just came out:»download.mozilla.org/?pr ··· ng=en-US · actions · 2013-Sep-21 3:58 am · dib22join:2002-01-27Kansas City, MO

dib22 to peggypwr1 Member 2013-Sep-21 5:46 am to peggypwr1Check here for

What does a midi-chlorian look like? Get More Info Log in or register to post comments Comment #8 sun CreditAttribution: sun commented April 17, 2011 at 11:21pm @Sepehr Lajevardi: I wanted to thank you once more for this incredibly useful For example, GreaseMonkey, which uses evalInSandbox to evaluate user scripts sets sandbox.__proto__ = window to provide access to the window APIs (note that in GM's case, window is an XPCNativeWrapper, which New Voice Technology Fee - $2 (edit: article was taken down) [ComcastXFINITY] by Darknessfall435.

But that wasn't the message. It is a micro update between 1.8.18 to 1.8.21. current community chat Stack Overflow Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. http://shpsoftware.com/javascript-error/javascript-error-with.php For reference, the ticket related to this commit (i.e.

Log in or register to post comments Comment #7 February 9, 2011 at 2:50pm Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed) Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity. Does this error message still need improvement? Further bisecting and I found the first problem commit upstream to be: jquery/[email protected] Indeed reverting this commit in later jQuery UI versions solved the problem for me.

It fails in 2.0.0.13 and 2.0.0.14.

The hard part was figuring out what Firebug was trying to do, and why win.__scope__ is made necessary by eIS, which I still don't understand!) Comment 6 John J. Comment 4 John J. Especially this technique: http://wiki.greasespot.net/Content_Scope_Runner We need to re-evaluate whether this technique also works for Chrome. After you call eIS, wrap the sandbox in a SJOW if you want to peek at it more, and wrap the eIS return in a SJOW. (See nsProxyAutoConfig.js via mxr for

Trying to use the firebug command line in a chrome context such as (chrome://firebug/content/firebug.xul) yields an "EvalError: function eval must be called directly, and not by way of a function of Also, as we improve the API, your extension will benefit, as opposed to some home-brew solution which you're on the hook for. What are the differences? this page You signed out in another tab or window.

Is that in correct? Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Code on a generator hook up? [HomeImprovement] by Corehhi318. I have seen that and I am not sure if I can update my jquery which looks stable for me. –user525146 Aug 30 '12 at 18:21 It seem the

Here are some of the pending ones: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=521&q=label:commandline http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=513&q=label:commandline http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=459&q=label:commandline http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=428&q=label:commandline http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=379&q=label:commandline But for me the real issue with evalInSandbox is simple: I can't predict what it will do.

© Copyright 2017 shpsoftware.com. All rights reserved.